Black and White?

Was going though a book I had read awhile ago and came across something I had marked when I originally read it. Something I think we should think more about each day:

"'We are facing an implacable enemy whose avowed objective is world domination,' the Doolittle Report, a highly classified evaluation of C.I.A covert operations, concluded in 1954. 'There are no rules in such a game. Hitherto acceptable norms of human conduct do not apply.' Eisenhower agreed. 'I have come to the conclusion that some of our traditional ideas of international sportsmanship are scarcely applicable in the morass in which the world now flounders,' he wrote privately in 1955. 'Truth, honor, justice, consideration for others, liberty for all - the problem is how to preserve them...when we are opposed by people who scorn...these values. I believe that we can do it,' and here he underlined his words for emphasis, 'but we must not confuse these values with mere procedures, even though these last may have at one time held almost the status of moral concepts.'
And so the Cold War transformed American leaders into Machiavellians. Confronted with 'so many who are not good,' they resolved 'to learn to be able not to be good' themselves, and to use this skill of not use it, as the great Italian cynic - and patriot - had put it, 'according to necessity'"

The Cold War by John Lewis Gaddis P. 165

I'm sure he was voting for change too...

Quazi-Socialized Medicine - The Genesis Post

Yea, this topic will be evolving a lot over the next 4 years. The non-socialized socialization of insurance and medical expenses.

To be fair, there is definitly a need for at least something to be done for helping people get some kind of medical coverage. Both candidates have expressed this. Second, this is not an issue that there is a "black and white" answer to. There will always be a case of someone that will be an outlier that would cause any solution to healthcare to not be "the best way" to fix it.

But what exactly is the current problem with healthcare? Or more refined, how does Obama's policy solve what he sees as the problem in healthcare?

But before that, what is GOOD in our current healthcare system?

1. The U.S. healthcare service is ranked, worldwide, number 1 for responsiveness.

http://www.who.int/whosis/database/core/core_select_process.cfm?strISO3_select=ALL&strIndicator_select=nha&intYear_select=latest&fixed=indicator&language=english

2. The number of people with health insurance increased to 253.4 million in 2007 (up from 249.8 million in 2006). The number of people covered by private health insurance (202.0 million) in 2007 was not statistically different from 2006, while the number of people covered by government health insurance increased to 83.0 million, up from 80.3 million in 2006. (Thats about 84.7% of Americans that have some form of health insurance)

http://www.census.gov/prod/2008pubs/p60-235.pdf


3. Everyone can have access to emergency care regardless of insurance status and ability to pay through the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), passed in 1986.

http://www.cms.hhs.gov/EMTALA/


Now let's look at what's BAD in our current healthcare system:

1. Americans without health insurance coverage at some time during 2007 totaled about 15.3% of the population, or 45.7 million people.

http://www.census.gov/prod/2008pubs/p60-235.pdf

2. The World Health Organization ranked, in 2000, the U.S. healthcare service the 37th in overall performance and 72nd by overall level of health.

http://www.who.int/whr/2000/en/annex01_en.pdf

3. Spending on healthcare in 2006 totaled $2.1 trillion, or 16% of GDP. This represented an increase of 6.7% over 2004 spending. Per capita spending was $7,026.

http://www.cms.hhs.gov/NationalHealthExpendData/01_Overview.asp

And what does Obama see as BAD in our healthcare system?

1. On health care reform, the American people are too often offered two extremes - government-run health care with higher taxes or letting the insurance companies operate without rules. Barack Obama and Joe Biden believe both of these extremes are wrong.

http://www.barackobama.com/issues/healthcare/

Doesn't really give much in detail of what the problem is, but if you read he does go more into specifics on health insurance.

This is the overview that I will start with. It's good to start with the framework, then work from there to fill in the details.

Dissent...at last

Well, time to crank up the ole' blog once again...

Politically speaking, this campaign season made me very apathetic towards politics. Both candidates, from my point of view, were lacking the leadership that this country needs now. One has his head up in the clouds in a fantasy and the other has his head buried in the sand, ignoring reality.

But now that the campaigning is over and a new President has been elected - happy for me a Democrat - I can now finally be an open dissident of policies.

You see, my own observations have shown me that if a person of a certain view on politics, a conservative for instance, begins attacking a politician of their own in order to show that they are "open to reason", all they end up doing is cannabalizing themselves and their party. For example, just because Bush may have been one of the worst managers in certain areas, doesn't mean I try to "find the middle ground" with a liberal to look "reasonable" in my politics. If I do, I end up villifying Bush in every policy, when in fact there either was no alternative or that policy was in fact the best option.

Now that there is a Democrat in office, I can now be open in my criticism. From campaign promises that will not be fulfilled, to botched handling of many soon to come policies and problems, I am happy I will be able to vent my frustrations, show the double standards, complain about issues that I don't agree with - and all this while not cannabalizing the party that I most closely assosciate with.

And there are already quite a few things I will be having a field day with...